home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Atari Mega Archive 1
/
Atari Mega Archive - Volume 1.iso
/
lists
/
mint
/
l_0399
/
33
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1994-08-27
|
2KB
From: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian@gina.uni-muenster.de>
Subject: Re: libraries
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 93 11:17:30 MET DST
In-Reply-To: <9301181714.AA12624@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>; from "Michal Jaegermann" at Jan 18, 93 10:12 am
Resent-To: mint@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu
Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 93 03:46:51 PST
Resent-From: Howard Chu <hyc@hanauma.Jpl.Nasa.Gov>
> In response to my proposition for organization of headers/libraries
> to accomodate both MiNT and TOS in a transparent manner Julian Reschke
> writes:
> > This is exactly what I don't want.
I think that you didn't understand at all about what I am speaking (no
offense; my problem :-) I want unified (==identical) and compatible
header files for TOS functions and structures, and I want them with
standardized filenames in standardized locations. I wasn't speaking
of TOS/MiNT differences or stdio considerations at all.
> I am sorry, but in that case I do not know what do you want. Maybe we
> can have some examples, please.
When using Pure, I have:
#include <tos.h>
DTA *dta = Fgetdta ();
With the MiNT include files, I have:
#include <osbind.h>
_DTA *dta = Fgetdta ();
And so on. Yes, I can resolve all that with conditional includes and
defines, but I really hate that. That's why I propose to make a fresh
start (of course you can continue to use the old header files with
old sources).
Note that operating system bindings should be identical, no matter
which compiler you use.
--
________________ cut here _________________________
Julian F. Reschke, Hensenstr. 142, D-W4400 Muenster
eMail: julian@math.uni-muenster.de, jr@ms.maus.de
________ correct me if I'm wrong __________________